- Posted by: johnnie-barton
- Sep 09,2016
- 0 comments
(1) Whether scheduling of meetings by a quorum of members of the COST by telephone conference would constitute a meeting; (2) Whether strict compliance with the OMA’s “Open Meeting” requirements by the COST would compromise the identity of an administrative law judge facing adverse personnel action, if the judge was present during the COST’s transition from an open session into a closed/executive session that was not held by electronic means; and (3)Whether the COST should be exempt from the OMA.
- OOG-004_9 7 16 OAH Advisory Opinion (278.83 KB)